DeVry ENGL 147 All Discussion
Questions - Graded
IF You Want To Purchase A+ Work
Then Click The Link Below , Instant Download
http://www.hwspeed.com/DeVry-ENGL-147-All-Discussion-Questions-Graded-4334039430.htm?categoryId=-1
If You Face Any Problem E- Mail Us At JOHNMATE1122@Gmail.Com
WEEK 1
Exploring the Course Themes
(graded)
|
The four course themes of education, technology, family, and
health and wellness are topics that touch each of our lives in some way. In this
discussion, practice exploring the themes as a researcher would: by creating
problem statements.
How do you do this? Ask and then answer the question using a
sub-topic (see below). Here’s an example. “For whom is [school bullying] a
problem?“ In your post, provide the question and then the answer to the
question. For example, “School bullying is a problem for victims of bullying
because. . . .” Complete the statement based on your experience and knowledge.
|
Topic Selection (graded)
|
To prepare for your topic selection and the research process,
conduct an Internet search to find at least two articles that have been posted
in the last year on one of the "themes" topics (i.e., bullying). The
goal is to find articles that take clear positions on the topic. Share what you
find and include the URL links to the articles. After you’ve posted, assess a
classmate’s links, indicating whether you’d like to read or hear more about the
topic and why.
WEEK 2
Argumentative Strategies (graded)
In research writing, what exactly do we mean by argument? Do
we mean taking an extreme position and standing our ground, whether or not the
facts support our position? Or do we mean instead convincing our audience by
taking a reasonable stance on an issue and supporting our position with
appropriate evidence? Define and explain the difference using examples.
|
Internet Reliability (graded)
|
How reliable is the Internet as a source of information for
your research? What are the ways you can validate information that you find on
the Internet? Why is this necessary? Use examples from the Information Literacy
module you reviewed this week.
This section lists options that can be used to view responses.
WEEK 3
|
Presenting Ideas (graded)
|
Persuasive presenters have several traits in common. Browse
through TED talks http://www.ted.com/talks or American Rhetoric Website at
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/ to find notable speakers who demonstrate
strong communication traits. Compare and contrast the ways these speakers
meaningfully communicate ideas to their audiences. Include the URL link of the
speaker you choose to write about. In a short paragraph, respond to a
classmate’s post, indicating whether you agree or disagree with his or her
choice, and why.
|
Preparing the Research Proposal
(graded)
|
How important is it to be personally invested in an idea? Can
you sell an idea that you have no stake in? Why or why not? Using one of the
resources from the Course Readings, provide an example of an author who is communicating
in a way that tells a reader that the author is credible and is a trustworthy
source.
WEEK 4
|
Annotated Bibliography Entries
(graded)
|
In your textbook (pp. 325–326), you’ll find a model of an
annotated bibliography. Review the model, focusing on the components of the
entry: (1) the reference citation, (2) the summary, and (3) the assessment.
Then draft one reference entry and two paragraphs from one of your sources.
We’ll use the rest of the week to peer review the entries to prepare you for
this week’s assignment.
This section lists options that can be used to view responses.
Argumentative Strategies (graded)
In presenting an argument, should a writer strive to be the
final authority or a reasonable voice on an issue? Review Chapter 22 to
understand the difference. Then, using your topic and one or more of your
sources, define and provide an example of an arguable claim as opposed to a
personal judgment.
WEEK 5
Analyzing a Sample Argument (graded)
In the textbook, review the student essay on p. 199,
“Allowing Guns on Campus Will Prevent Shootings, Rape.” In an abbreviated
format, the sample contains the elements that you will be including in your
Course Project. The controversial subject matter (the content) may engage you
right away. This is a sign that the writer is applying an argumentative
strategy. Focus on the organization. What do you notice about the way the topic
is introduced? How will your draft be similar or different?
Organizational Patterns in Argument
(graded)
Let’s look at samples of research-based writing: “Nervous
Nellies” on p. 328; “From Degrading to De-Grading” on p. 254; and “How Many
Zombies Do You Know?” on p. 290.
Review each selection and include in your post responses to
these questions. What do you notice about how each is organized and presented?
What kinds of appeals to the audience does each author use? How are sources
used in text?
Reading Strategy Note: Unlike summary and paraphrase, which
require close reading, for this discussion use the reading strategy of
skimming. Carefully read the introductory paragraph, but then move quickly,
reading only the topic sentence of each paragraph. The goal is to compare and
contrast the differences in the presentation of the information in the
document. Skim and review until you have an impression you can share in the
discussion.
WEEK 6
Rebuttals and Refutations (graded)
Anticipating readers’ objections is one way to determine what
other sections to include and support in your paper. Practice writing a rebuttal
or a refutation by taking your thesis and considering the point of view of
someone who believes differently or even the opposite of the argument you are
making. To do this, review Chapter 10, pp. 449–452 and post a paragraph that
summarizes an oppositional point of view to your thesis and then refutes it. As
peers, reply to one another explaining whether or not your classmates are
presenting the opposition objectively and whether the refutation is logical.
Give one another ideas or suggestions for points that may be left out or might
need to be further developed. The paragraph you draft here can be used in a
section of your Second Draft this week.
|
Designing Your Course Project
(graded)
|
While APA-style citation and format is required, you do have
the flexibility in the design of your Course Project to include a visual
element. Review Chapter 17, pp. 382–387. How does the use of visual elements
enhance or detract from the presentation of research? Will you add graphs,
charts, or images to your draft? Why or why not?
WEEK 7
APA Workshop (graded)
Each academic area of study has a particular style for documenting
the ideas of other scholars. The standards of formatting document you’ve been
using is from the American Psychological Association (APA). This is the
preferred style in the social sciences. As you’ve noticed, there is a strong
emphasis on the publication date. Why do you think there is such an emphasis on
the date? As you work on revising your Course Project, what questions do you
have about how to incorporate standard APA format and documentation guidelines
into your essay? Are there any sources you are having a hard time documenting?
Any questions about your reference entries?
No comments:
Post a Comment